Freepik

This tool offers the following AI models:

• Eleven v3 (alpha)
• Flux 1.1
• FLUX Kontext [Max]
• Flux Kontext [Pro]
• FLUX.2 [flex]
• FLUX.2 [pro]
• Gemini 2.5 Flash
• GPT‑4o
• Hailuo 01
• Hailuo 01 Live
• Hailuo 01 Reference
• Hailuo 01-Director
• Hailuo 02
• Hailuo 2.3
• Ideogram 3.0
• Ideogram Character
• Imagen 3
• Imagen 4
• Imagen 4 Ultra
• Kling 1.6 Elements
• Kling 1.6 Pro
• Kling 2.0
• Kling 2.1
• Kling 2.1 Master
• Kling 2.5 Turbo
• Kling 2.5 Turbo Standard
• Kling 2.6
• Kling O1 Omni
• LTX-2
• LTX-2 Fast
• Luma Ray2
• Nano Banana 2.0
• Pixverse V4.5
• PixVerse V5
• Runway Act-Two
• Runway Gen-4
• Runway's Gen-4 Image
• Seedance 1.0 Lite
• Seedance 1.0 Pro
• Seedance 1.0 Pro Fast
• Seedream 3.0
• Seedream 4.0
• Seedream 4.5
• Sora 2
• Veo 2
• Veo 3 Fast
• Veo 3 Quality
• Veo 3.1
• Veo 3.1 Fast
• Wan 2.2
• Wan2.2 Animate
• Z-Image Turbo

Where multiple modes are available, the calculations are done for the most advanced (and costly) ones.

Pricing can change, make sure to check relevant links for any updates to the subscription plans.

People using Freepik AI have a mix of opinions. Some love the tools, saying it's the best AI purchase they've made, while others feel some features don’t work as expected. The image generator and upscaler get a lot of praise, but video generation and some design tools still need work.

What Users Like:

• Great value for money. Many users say the subscription is worth it, especially with discounts.
• AI models improving fast. The Flux 1.1 Pro and Mystic models are well-received for high-quality images.
• Custom Styles and Characters. People appreciate the ability to create unique styles and consistent character designs.
• Reimagine and Sketch to Image. Users find these tools useful for creative workflows.
• Upscaler is a standout. Many say this feature alone makes Freepik worth it.

What Users Don't Like:

• Video generation is slow and unreliable. Some say it takes much longer than expected or fails frequently.
• Interface is messy. A few users complain that the UI on both web and mobile is confusing.
• Style consistency is lacking. Artists trying to generate work in specific styles (cubism, expressionism, etc.) say the AI struggles to stay true to those styles.
• Some editing tools feel limited. Features like turning an image into "clay style" don't work as expected.
• The Expand tool needs work. Some users notice lighting inconsistencies when expanding images.

Source: [ Reddit ]

After using Freepik AI heavily for a month (burning through 100k+ credits), it’s clear the platform has a lot to offer. Mystic 2.5 is the standout model for realistic fantasy images, beating Flux realism hands down. Text-to-image tools are top-tier, and character reference training is solid, though pricey at 5,500 credits. The upscaler and expand feature work flawlessly, making Freepik a great tool for high-quality images.

Video generation is decent but inconsistent. Freepik offers multiple models like Kling, Luma, and Hailuo, but results vary. Kling 1.6 is great for natural motion, but lip sync is still hit-or-miss and generates glitches. Some video tools perform better on their original platforms, making Freepik’s version feel limited.

Inpainting and Sketch-to-Image are useful but not game-changing. Inpainting works best on the quick setting, and sketch-based image generation produces decent results. Adding multiple characters to an image is frustrating—you have to generate one, then manually inpaint the rest.

Biggest annoyances? AI moderation and video bugs. The system overblocks NSFW content, making even basic fight scenes impossible. There’s also a video folder bug where newly generated content appears broken until you refresh the page.

Despite these issues, Freepik AI is worth it—especially if you need high-quality images fast. Mystic 2.5 alone makes it a great pick for fantasy artists. If you’re unsure, start with the cheapest plan and see if it fits your needs.

Source: [ Reddit ]